What principle should be remembered when restraining an elderly client?

Using the least restrictive device or method first is crucial when restraining an elderly client because it prioritizes the individual's dignity and autonomy while ensuring their safety. The principle of least restraint emphasizes that interventions should be the minimum necessary to achieve the intended safety outcome. This approach aligns with ethical standards, promoting a person-centered care model that respects the rights and preferences of the elderly client.

In practice, this means exploring various alternatives to restraint, such as less invasive methods or environmental modifications that can help manage agitation or unsafe behaviors without resorting to physical restraints. This strategy not only helps maintain trust and rapport between caregivers and clients but also reduces the potential for physical and psychological harm that can occur with more restrictive methods.

The other options do not align with best practices in client care. For instance, using the most restrictive device contradicts the principle of least restraint and can lead to increased distress for the elderly client. As for the notion of using restraint only in emergencies, while it is important to act swiftly in a crisis, the focus should always be on prevention and least restrictive measures as a priority. Lastly, favoring physical restraints over chemical restraints ignores the evolving understanding of client care that encourages non-chemical interventions and the potential risks associated with both physical and chemical restraints.